• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corney & Lind Lawyers

Your FAQs to our Brisbane Personal Injury Lawyers

Ask a PI question and receive a response on our blog for free

Menu

Main navigation

Close menu

  • Home
  • Our Services
    • Latest News
    • Insurance & Super
      • Income Protection
      • Total Permanent Disability (TPD)
    • Work-Related Accidents
      • Common Law Claims
      • Statutory Claims
      • Asbestos & Dust Claims
    • Personal Injury Proceedings Act (PIPA)
      • Accidents in Public Places
      • Airline Accidents
      • Consumer Hazards
      • Other Transport Accidents
    • Motor Vehicle Accidents
  • No Win No fee
  • Contact Us
  • Webinars

Does WorkCover take into account psychiatric problems I now face as a result of an incident that occurred at my workplace?

September 28, 2015 by Natasha Duff 1 Comment

Psychological or psychiatric injury (PPI) is listed as a type of injury that can be compensated for under the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld). This type of injury can have a significant and lasting impact on your work life and home life. It can also impact on the employer’s business where an employee is unable to adequately fulfil their duties as a result of a PPI.

In all jurisdictions across Australia, an workplace injury is only compensable under workers compensation legislation if it arose out of or in the course of employment. Workers’ compensation laws qualify this further by stating that the employment must have been something akin to the major contributing factor to the psychiatric injury (or other type of injury).

Workplace claims for psychiatric injury are generally not accepted if they arise out of a reasonable action taken by the employer in relation to dismissal, demotion, retrenchment, transfer, performance appraisal, disciplinary action or deployment. Neither will they be accepted if they arise out of reasonable decisions by an employer not to award or provide promotion, reclassification, leave of absence or some other benefit in connection with the workers employment.

WorkCover and psychiatric injury

In Queensland, WorkCover is the statutory body who insure against workplace injury. They are the ones who will determine the outcome of your work related personal injury claim. Each state in Australia will have their various requisite government agency equivalents. When making a decision about a PPI claim, WorkCover will apply the criteria and exclusions as outlined in the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld) (the Act).

The Act states that ‘an injury is personal injury arising out of, or in the course of, employment if, for a psychiatric or psychological disorder – the employment is the major significant contributing factor to the injury.’ It is also set out in the Act that a PPI includes ‘an aggravation of a psychiatric or psychological disorder, if the aggravation arises out of, or in the course of, employment and the employment is the major significant contributing factor to the aggravation.’

Psychological or psychiatric injury might be purely psychiatric or may be secondary to a physical injury, arising for example from trauma, or from witnessing a traumatic event. To be able to make a claim for psychiatric injury there must first be a psychological or psychiatric disorder diagnosed by an experienced medical professional. Relevant medical professionals across Australia make diagnosis by reference to the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).

Scenarios where legitimate workplace PPI’s result might include prolonged exposure to stressful situations that contribute to the development of a serious psychiatric disorder, or exposure to a one-off traumatic or stressful event that lead to a psychiatric disorder. The disorder would need to fall within the DSM-5 spectrum of Depressive Disorders, Anxiety Disorders, or Trauma/Stressor related Disorders.

The worker might be experiencing the presence of sad, empty, or irritable moods, accompanied by a diminished capacity to function; excessive fear and anxiety and related behavioural disturbances; lack of joy, difficulty speaking, aggressive behaviours, dissociation, or a combination of the above as a result of something that occurred or is occurring in the workplace.

WorkCover will decide your claim by discussing with you the details of the injury, and the events that have contributed to it, as well as gathering relevant information from your employer, doctors, allied health professionals, witnesses (where relevant) and/or independent medical examiners.

If you wish to have a free consultation with one of our Brisbane personal injury lawyers, you can contact our office on (07) 3252 0011 or through our general enquiries page.

Filed Under: Common Law Claims, Statutory Claims, Work-Related Accidents Tagged With: Brisbane lawyer, Brisbane personal injury, christian lawyer, compensation, corney & lind, corney and lind, injury, injury at work, personal injury, personal injury lawyer, PI, Work-Related Accidents, workcover, workers compensation and rehabilitation act

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. James Pere says

    July 7, 2016 at 9:11 pm

    Dear Mr Watson
    As an experienced and formally qualified Security Officer for Queensland Health at Gladstone
    Hospital I was vilified by a co-worker, Chris Galuke who arrested me, leading to
    unlawful testing of urine and blood, necessitating exposure to unauthorised female staff. Through
    Zac Beers AWU, Qld Heath admitted guilt.
    Compounding trauma occurred as, in Far North Qld, I had been bashed in the workplace and my
    precious phone was smashed (my contact with outside world). Qld Heath gives the excuse that I had
    previously been a victim of Domestic Violence, so an unjust settlement must occur. A female (my
    ex-wife) bashed me in the workplace, so that presented an opportunity for Qld Health to exploit Domestic Violence in the court. There is been no proper medical attention given to the claims in according to their own policies un-therapeutic misconduct. They exacerbated and already stressful situation which is against their own policies.
    The law firms namely Maurice Blackburn lawyers, Carew Lawyers and Jonathan Whitten and Associates terminated my claim after promising to represent me in the court for reasons which are unknown. Now I ask the court’s permission to represent myself in the court. The trial dates are scheduled on the 22nd, 23rd and 24th of August 2016 and unfortunately nobody will act for me and I will be representing myself in the District Court in Brisbane.
    Additionally, my tpd claim was declined and discrimination against superannuation rights. My ex employer (Qld Health) refused me to access my right to income protection which I was entitled to whilst on depress and anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder.
    My assailant was working as a Security Officer, but was unqualified and committed an unlawful
    act based on prejudice and racial vilification. I had blood and urine demanded from me as I
    was vilified and sexually exposed by female staff. Mr. Chris Galuke was supported by many in Qld Heath and the intention was to undermine my integrity and leave me without support, in the belief that I would not cope alone.
    The extent of my experiences is not acknowledged by Qld Heath and I will never forget the degree of racial vilification, humiliation, nor ridicule I was subjected to. It is expected that I will endure this as a rite of initiation to Qld Heath.

    Yours Sincerely
    James Pere

    Reply

Ask a Question Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Terms & Conditions

Content on this site including responses to your questions and comments provides legal information, tips and hints. The content on this site is not legal advice. That’s good, because there’s no risk of getting a bill by making a comment, asking a question or just contacting us.

You agree that any comment or question that you may ask may be published on this site, after editorial review, for the benefit of future readers. Our editors may edit comments in their discretion. For example we will would seek to remove information that would identify you.

Corney & Lind Lawyers Pty Ltd are of course happy to give legal advice, that’s what they do for a living. However it is only legal advice when you have engaged Corney & Lind Lawyers to provide legal advice for you. Before you do that you want to have an idea of what it might cost and our lawyers are happy to communicate with you about this in advance of any costs being incuured.

We may change any of these terms and conditions at any time in our discretion by changing them on this page.

Primary Sidebar

Ask a Question

Newsletter Signup

Sign up to get our free newsletter!

No Win No Fee

Topics

  • Compensation Law
  • Insurance & Super
    • Income Protection
    • Total Permanent Disability (TPD)
  • Latest News
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents
  • Personal Injury Proceedings Act (PIPA)
    • Accidents in Public Places
    • Airline Accidents
    • Consumer Hazards
    • Other Transport Accidents
  • Work-Related Accidents
    • Asbestos & Dust Claims
    • Common Law Claims
    • Statutory Claims

Copyright © 2019 Corney & Lind Lawyers Pty Ltd ABN 60 161 541 500. All Rights Reserved.

Sitemap Terms & Conditions Admin